< Previous                                                                                                                  Next >

McMorsel: How can an area source
still be a major source?

looking out of a box towards the sky

Sorting out source reclassification for HAPs.

One portion of the regulations that has been changing over the past few years is reclassification of major sources to area sources (MM2A) for hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). In the mid-1990s, when EPA was first implementing the Part 63 air toxics standards (aka NESHAPs), the agency issued the “once in, always in” policy, which said any source that was a major source on the compliance date for an air toxics standard would always be a major source for that standard. Thus, even if the source lowered its HAP emissions below major source thresholds, it would remain a major source for that standard forever.

This policy was withdrawn in 2018, allowing major sources to reclassify as area sources at any time. EPA then issued its MM2A rule that codified this into the regulations on November 19, 2020. [85 FR 73854] On September 10, 2024, in a reversal to control sources of bioaccumulative HAPs, EPA listed 33 source categories that are once again—subject to once in, always in, and this is the current status. [89 FR 73293] Because this is a delegated program, these changes are generally effective in all states at the same time. For more compliance morsels, visit our website.

UPDATE: Congress repealed the September 2024 rule under the Congressional Review Act (CRA), and the resolution was signed into law on June 20, 2025. We expect legal challenges to ensue.

 



 

McCoy and Associates, Inc. makes no representation, warranty, or guarantee in connection with any guidance provided above. McCoy and Associates, Inc. expressly disclaims any liability or responsibility for loss or damage resulting from its use or for the violation of any federal, state, or municipal law or regulation with which such guidance may conflict. Any guidance above is general in nature related to the federal environmental regulations. Persons evaluating specific circumstances dealing with environmental regulations should review state and local laws and regulations, which may be more stringent than federal requirements. In addition, the assistance of a qualified professional should be enlisted to address any site-specific circumstances.